一边倒的典型观点的题型一般容易处理，那假如碰到了非一边倒的题型呢?

　　环球教育(原环球教育)小编教你雅思写作中非一边倒的题型应该如何进行写作：

　　一、雅思写作非一边倒的思路

　　南京环球教育小编要首先指出，很多雅思写作考题的提问方式都是“Do you agree or disagree?”或者“To what extent do you agree or disagree?”。很多刚刚接触雅思考试的学生甚至是老师认为对于这种提问方式无非就是yes或no两种答案，所以文章的观点也就只能是同意或者不同意了。

　　其实，对于这类提问，南京环球教育认为，也可以采用“折衷”的观点，即“partly agree，partly disagree”(部分同意，部分不同意)。但是前提是一定要在文章中从支持和反对的两方面都阐述一些理由，而且最好再提出一种“折衷”方案。

　　南京环球教育举个例子，例如考题问“现在很多人用动物做试验，你同意吗?”，考生可以在文中分别讨论支持和反对动物试验的理由，最后提出动物试验既有好处也有坏处，这就是一种“折衷”观点。除此之外，作者还提出了是否能用动物来做试验主要是取决于试验是否能给人类生活带来显著的改善(比如帮助人类发明治疗Aids的药物)。

　　二、雅思写作非一边倒的策略

　　针对以上分析，下面南京环球教育将将对常见的几种安排折衷观点和折衷方案的形式，结合相应的考题进行总结。.

　　策略1：平衡发展

　　很多考题需要考生讨论两种观点，通常会有“discuss both views and give your own opinion”这样的提问要求。很多情况下，南京环球教育发现，文中说到的两种观点表面上看来是完全相反，但其实并不矛盾，可以用“平衡发展”的思路来提出观点。例如考题：

　　Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed at tourists. Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions. Discuss on both sides and give your opinion.

　　在讨论完发展旅游的必要性和保护文化传统的重要性之后，结尾段南京环球教育认为，可以这样提出折衷方案：

　　We should find the right balance between tourism development and cultural protection and I believe the government has a very important role to play here. In my own country, for example, many tourist cities have made effective development plans to successfully attract large numbers of visitors while still preserving their distinct cultural traditions.

　　策略2： 取决于……

　　南京环球教育总结发现，有时在讨论完A和B两种观点以后，可以提出类似于“同意A还是B要取决于……”这样的折衷观点，前文讲到的动物试验是否可以进行取决于试验的性质就是属于这样的方案。再比如下面这个例子：

　　Some people think that the animals should be treated as pets; others think that animals are sources of food and clothing. What is your opinion?

　　南京环球教育建议，在讨论完动物当宠物养的理由和动物当食物吃的理由之后，结尾段可以这样提出观点：

　　From my point of view, there is no absolute answer as to whether animals should be treated like pets or as sources of food and clothes. It largely depends on what kinds of animals they are. But what remains undoubted is that we should treat animals with a humane attitude and bear in mind that they are important in preserving nature’s ecological equilibrium.